Definition: For he found her in the field, [and] the betrothed damsel cried, and [there was] none to save her.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Deuteronomy 22:27. It’s a really important and somewhat sad passage about responsibility and protecting someone who is in distress. Here's what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Situation: “She was in the field…” – This describes a woman who is working or tending to her crops, likely in a rural area. “…the betrothed damsel” – This refers to a woman who is engaged to someone and has been given to someone else as a "bride." It’s a special kind of marriage that’s meant to be permanent and stable. “Cried…” - She was distressed, possibly in pain or fear. “…and there was none to save her.” – This is the key part. There was no one who could help her. She was alone and vulnerable. What it Means – A Moral Lesson: This verse essentially tells us that it's our responsibility to protect those in need, especially those who are vulnerable. It highlights a few important points: We have a duty of care: We should look out for the well-being of others, even if they aren’t directly our concern. It’s about protecting those who are dependent: The verse emphasizes that it's not enough to just be nice; we must actively intervene when someone is in danger or suffering. It’s a consequence for wrongdoing: It suggests that this situation could happen if someone acted carelessly, disrespectfully, or was irresponsible. Why is it important? This verse is often seen as a reminder of the importance of: Respecting boundaries: We should respect people's boundaries and not force our way into situations where they might be in danger. Taking responsibility for our actions: It’s about being mindful of the consequences of our behavior. In short, Deuteronomy 22:27 is a call to action – it encourages us to actively protect those who are vulnerable and to act with compassion and responsibility. --- Would you like me to explain any part of this verse in more detail, perhaps focusing on a specific aspect of the situation or its significance within the larger context of the Old Testament?